Reef Builders - The Source for Reef Keeping Information

Reef Builders Forums » Saltwater Aquariums » Equipment » ASM vs. Aqua C

Reef Produce ReviewsSubmit your own review, or look at others.
Reef Builders Chat: meet daily from 6:00PM CST to 12:00PM CST Login
Reef Builders Library: a wealth of information at your fingertips, check out a book now
 
 
 

Equipment Protein Skimmers, Calicium Reactors, RO Units, Ozone, Controllers, Overflows, Pumps, Powerheads, UV, Heaters, Chillers, Lighting, Sumps
Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:24 AM
blu23girl's Avatar
Master RB in the making
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 182
Tank Size (US GAL): 120
Experience: 6 Months
Name: Rachel
Blog Entries: 0
blu23girl is looking at reefs
Default ASM vs. Aqua C

Ok, so i am looking at these two skimmers for my NEW (when it arrives) 120 gal. Acrylic tank!

I plan on thins being a reef set-up, so I'm guessing the bio-load will be pretty high...

Anyway, does anyone have an opinion on these? Is this enough of a skimmer, or should i go larger? Which is better?? Experiences?? Is there anything for comparable price that is better?

http://www.fishtanksdirect.com/index...rodID=551&HS=1
http://www.fishtanksdirect.com/index...PROD&ProdID=23

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 07:44 AM
sgarron's Avatar
Carpel tunnel from RB
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 315
Tank Size (US GAL): 180
Experience: 1 Year
Name: Steve
Blog Entries:
sgarron is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

I have had both. The Aqua-C EV180 and I now have an ASM G4X. The Aqua-C is easier to use but the ASM has given me better results. Although I did modify the ASM. (gate valve mod and recirc mod). Aquacave has a better price and free shipping. They are both very good skimmers.

ASM G Series P rotein Skimmers
__________________
You want cheap? Get a goldfish.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:08 AM
Jay03GT's Avatar
Master RB in the making
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lakeland, Fl
Posts: 151
Tank Size (US GAL): 120
Experience: New
Name: Jay
Blog Entries:
Jay03GT is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

when I was contemplating skimmers for my 120 I was between the ASM G3 and the Euroreef RS135. IMO a G3 is a better fit for the 120 over the G2 you are looking at, and it isn't much more money. It should come with a bigger pump (my euroreef came with a sedra 5000) that will give you better results on a tank that big.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 04:28 PM
Rainman69's Avatar
Hooked on RB
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tucson az
Posts: 97
Tank Size (US GAL): 120
Experience: 6 Years
Name: Ray
Blog Entries:
Rainman69 is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

Where do they make asm I could not find out. I say spend the extra 40 bucs and get a Euroreef. Made in USA and other than pump should last a life time.
__________________
Long live vinyl.........
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 05:39 PM
cokipoint's Avatar
Diving in
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 64
Tank Size (US GAL): 180
Experience: New
Blog Entries:
cokipoint is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

You can't go wrong with the ASM or Euro Reef. I am getting a G3 for my 150gallon. The ASM is just less exspensive compare to Euro reef. Never heard anything bad about eighther one.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 05:46 PM
pogodzib's Avatar
Reef Grand Master


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 2,064
Tank Size (US GAL): 220
Experience: 6 Years
Name: Brian
Blog Entries: 0
pogodzib is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

I've never owned (or seen in person) an ASM skimmer, but I've owned a few different AquaC skimmers. The AquaC skimmers work good if you oversize the pump 1-2 sizes above the recommended amount. ASM skimmers were all the rage a few years ago as a cheap replacement to the Euroreef, but many people (myself included) are getting Octopus skimmers instead since they are supposed to be built better than the ASM and be cheaper. My Octopus skimmer isn't broken in yet so I can't compare how much gunk it pulls out to my AquaC.
__________________
Current Tanks: 220 Gal Reef, 10 Gal FW, 6 Gal FW
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:36 PM
blu23girl's Avatar
Master RB in the making
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 182
Tank Size (US GAL): 120
Experience: 6 Months
Name: Rachel
Blog Entries: 0
blu23girl is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

So would the Euro-reef RC-135 be the correct size for my 120 gal tank? or do i need to go larger?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:54 PM
Rainman69's Avatar
Hooked on RB
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tucson az
Posts: 97
Tank Size (US GAL): 120
Experience: 6 Years
Name: Ray
Blog Entries:
Rainman69 is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

You will be very pleased with 135. IMO If anything there underrated.
__________________
Long live vinyl.........
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:32 AM
stephaniesquires's Avatar
RB extremist!!!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 932
Tank Size (US GAL): 300
Experience: 6 Months
Name: Stephanie
Blog Entries:
stephaniesquires is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

Quote:
Originally Posted by blu23girl View Post
So would the Euro-reef RC-135 be the correct size for my 120 gal tank? or do i need to go larger?
Remember to take the water from sump and fuge (if you have either or if you plan on getting either) into account when determining your water volume. 120 gallon tank, 30 gallon sump = 150 gallons...
__________________
Steph

I like long walks, especially when taken by people who annoy me...
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:38 AM
Rainman69's Avatar
Hooked on RB
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tucson az
Posts: 97
Tank Size (US GAL): 120
Experience: 6 Years
Name: Ray
Blog Entries:
Rainman69 is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

Well I don't know exactly how many gallons my system actually holds In the end. Depending on how your tank Is set up, With a dsb and 1.5 pounds of rock you lose many gallons in tank. Unless your sump/fuge Is huge I think this balances out.
__________________
Long live vinyl.........
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 09:49 AM
stephaniesquires's Avatar
RB extremist!!!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 932
Tank Size (US GAL): 300
Experience: 6 Months
Name: Stephanie
Blog Entries:
stephaniesquires is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainman69 View Post
Well I don't know exactly how many gallons my system actually holds In the end. Depending on how your tank Is set up, With a dsb and 1.5 pounds of rock you lose many gallons in tank. Unless your sump/fuge Is huge I think this balances out.
Somewhere on my favorites list is a site where you can calculate your water volume taking into consideration your sand and rock, I will look for it, pretty handy site....Maybe someone else has it available??? Anybody got their favorites organized? (just another skill you need forthis hobby )
__________________
Steph

I like long walks, especially when taken by people who annoy me...
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007, 12:09 PM
pogodzib's Avatar
Reef Grand Master


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 2,064
Tank Size (US GAL): 220
Experience: 6 Years
Name: Brian
Blog Entries: 0
pogodzib is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

Since I feel that you can't overskim a tank, I ignore the rock and sand volume and base my skimmer size on the tank and sump size only. Most skimmers are way overrated for reef tank sizes anyway.
__________________
Current Tanks: 220 Gal Reef, 10 Gal FW, 6 Gal FW
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2007, 04:26 AM
Mattfish's Avatar
Master RB
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 584
Tank Size (US GAL): 125
Experience: 1 Year
Name: Mike
Blog Entries: 0
Mattfish is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

Part 1 - I'm in absolutely no way smart enough or experienced enough to contradict Pogodzib.

Part 2 - we just got a EuroReef RS-135 for our 125g acrylic new setup. Having come from a Coralife SuperSkimmer 220, I can tell you that the difference is night and day. The Coralife was totally inconsistent from minute to minute, so the EuroReef is like experiencing a whole new thing. The design, the bubble production, the consistency, the ability to clean/empty the cup without shutting evrything off, etc. I've found from our short experience with the EuroReef that it provides immeasurably better coverage on our tank compared to the old Coralife, and while I abolsutely agree that you can't overskim a tank, the RS-135 seems just fine for our size tank.

My suspicion is that the quality of the process and design is so much higher that the efficiency is therefore much higher. But going back to point 1, for the relatively small difference in price, why not get the larger unit and be prepared? (who nows if you're going to move up to a larger tank at some point?) In my relatively short experience, this seems to be the most important piece of equipment in the entire setup. The second decision of importance seems to be the choice of sump/fuge and even for newbies seems to be a better way to start. We made the mistake of going with a poor sump with no fuge and a poor skimmer and had nothing but trouble, lost coral, and lost fish. At the time, I though I was taking the right path, but if I could start all over again, which is in effect what we've now done, it's worth the investment in the best equipment and best planned setup you can reasonably afford. The time and money we spent on our intial setup was completely worthless, and the loss of life it caused was something that will weigh on us, even though it was due to ignorance, and not bad intentions.

Last edited by Mattfish; 12-01-2007 at 04:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:39 AM
pogodzib's Avatar
Reef Grand Master


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 2,064
Tank Size (US GAL): 220
Experience: 6 Years
Name: Brian
Blog Entries: 0
pogodzib is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

FYI - Many people base their sizing on any brand of skimmer by using the Euro-Reef sizing recommendations (Euro-Reef). Euro-Reef says that the RC-135 is rated for an "Average Load = 135 gal or Heavy Load = 100 gal"


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattfish View Post
Part 1 - I'm in absolutely no way smart enough or experienced enough to contradict Pogodzib.
EVERYONE is entitled to their own opinion and I love to hear them.
__________________
Current Tanks: 220 Gal Reef, 10 Gal FW, 6 Gal FW
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 08:31 PM
Mattfish's Avatar
Master RB
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 584
Tank Size (US GAL): 125
Experience: 1 Year
Name: Mike
Blog Entries: 0
Mattfish is looking at reefs
Default Re: ASM vs. Aqua C

Quote:
Originally Posted by pogodzib View Post
EVERYONE is entitled to their own opinion and I love to hear them.
I always have an opinion, but you know what they say about them....

My system isn't bearing any load yet, and I was/am concerned about the loading - but the lfs said it would definitely be fine and would trade it out if not. I'll let you know how it goes once we get everything in the tank....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
14 Gallon Aqua pod imprezachic991 Introductions and Welcomes 5 01-17-2008 04:55 PM
Aqua UV sterilizer Tonz of fun $$ Used Equipment & Drygoods Selling 3 11-21-2007 10:27 AM
getting aqua pod 24 coopdogyo New to the Hobby (Getting Started/Setting Up) 4 03-21-2007 01:11 PM
red sea max or aqua pod coopdogyo New to the Hobby (Getting Started/Setting Up) 1 03-19-2007 09:39 AM
Aqua C Remora Pro Skimmer vs. Prizm Pro Deluxe Skimmer? ignath Equipment 5 02-23-2007 06:35 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.